Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
BrianC

451 Actual Realistic Mileage, Anyone?

187 posts in this topic

My first fill-up produced just shy of 38 MPG. I discount that figure because I don't know how full the tank was from the dealership.Second fill-up today was 39.5 MPG and the mix of city/highway (40/60)and solo/passenger (60/40) were roughly the same as the first fill-up.Both fill-ups at COSTCO. Auto mode almost exclusively. Not a lead-foot but definitely not a hyper-miler.

I'd call that totally acceptable mileage for winter driving. That should improve by about 5 MPG in the summer I'd guess. Do you have or will you be getting a Scangauge? When we get our smart I'll get the newer model. Using the first generation model now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fill-up #3 yielded 41.9 MPG. COSTCO premium gas. Heavily biased toward highway driving and 90% solo (but I weigh enough for 2). Still using Automatic mode exclusively and definitely not babying it. Total miles just under 900 from new.I definitely need cruise control. I keep finding myself at 70 MPH+. I don't need a speeding ticket.

Edited by dancote

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My fill-up #3 yielded 39 MPG (32 MPG U.S.) 100% city driving in sub-zero temps. So it is improving. Just over 1000 km. on the odom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fill-up #4 = 40.85 MPG (U.S.). Slightly less than my last fill but I attribute that to my increasingly heavy right foot.

Edited by dancote

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We've only had our new 2008 smart for a couple of weeks, and now have 600 miles on it. Did my second tank fillup today, and first where I knew how it had been filled previously. Squeezed in as much as I could both times. This last tank I did lots of freeway driving at 60 MPH and some State highways at around 50 MPH. 340 miles, 6.417 gallons. 52.98 MPG! 4.44 L/100KM Better than I thought I'd get. I don't anticipate getting that all the time, but it looks like mid 40s should be regularly attainable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's spectacular!My last fill gave 3.62 L/100 km (65 US). But my car is slow....

Edited by Mike T

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's spectacular!My last fill gave 3.62 L/100 km (65 US). But my car is slow....

Thanks. For a gasser is pretty darn good. I won't drive like that all the time, but it's nice to know it's possible. If a dieser were available here, I'd probably would have bought it instead.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. For a gasser is pretty darn good. I won't drive like that all the time, but it's nice to know it's possible. If a dieser were available here, I'd probably would have bought it instead.

Mike has an oil burner.But your 4.44L/100km is pretty darn good too!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It just keeps getting better.Our smart now has 1,200 miles on the clock and yesterday's fill-up #5 yielded 43.88 MPG (5.36 l/100km).That's the best so far but it's been over 40 MPG since the 3rd fill-up.I doubt I'll ever catch Dave777 though.

Edited by dancote

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My best mileage to date was today; and it just so happens that my odometer just surpassed 10,000 kms this weekend. A highway jaunt from Winnipeg to Portage la Prairie and back doing 110kph, + about an additional 85 kms in the city, yielded 5.38L/100 kms (or 52.47 mpg imperial).PS. I'm never light on the pedal! I never thought we'd get this type of mileage 'cause both my wife & I are pretty speedy & aggresive drivers.

Edited by denisjolicoeur

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

43.5 mpg driving from alexandria va to norfolk in the new 451...all highway 55-65mph

Edited by SCHMART

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's 5.4 L/100 km... hell I'm at 5.6 L/100 km for this tank on my cdi, so you're already proving you can beat the Diesel without really trying ;)-Iain

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wooo Hooo Gas Milage is getting better and better with every fill...This last tank I did 525.3 Km on 28.3.9 litres and I've been a lead foot....Go Spikey... :cheer: Go Spikey... :cheer: Go Spikey... :cheer:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's 5.3 L/100 km, amazing!I ran a tank through the loaner 451 I had, and with a heavy foot, I was at 6.5 L/100 km.-Iain

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Service Manager suggested using shell V-Power gas, and it seems to have made an improvement. I was considering using an ethenol blend gas to see if the higher octaine would help, but he said to wait until I had about 5000 miles on the car first. If it keeps going like this then I'll stick with the shell gas. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

E10 fuel will *lower* mileage. The high octane boosts hp but on a smart, it's probably 1 or 2hp at the most.Why the reduced mileage? cause you're burning 90% of your tank of fuel, not all of it. You're going the distance of 90% of the tank yet you're pumping the equivalent of 100%. It is cleaner burning though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

E doesn't = 0, but roughly 6 I thinkSo you should go 96% as far running E10

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why the reduced mileage? cause you're burning 90% of your tank of fuel, not all of it. You're going the distance of 90% of the tank yet you're pumping the equivalent of 100%. It is cleaner burning though.

:confused:

Ok, I'm a little confused by this. Help me to understand.

Are you saying:

[*]Because I'm only pumping in 28.393 litres of gas and the tank size is 33 litres, is this why your are saying that I'm burning 90% of my tank.

Or

[*] Is it related to E10 gas, that it will reduce my milage. In other words I can go farther on a tank of gas than I can on a tank of E10?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

# 2 - 100 litres of 90% gas + 10% Ethanol will take you as far as 96 litres of 100% gas. There is less energy available in the ethanol. We will not get into the costs associated with manufacturing that 10% ethanol, as it has been discussed in depth (for and against) elsewhere.MG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah Valgard's got that right. E10 is like you're only pumping in 90% of your tank with fuel. The ethanol is dead weight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

    Chatbox
    You don't have permission to chat.
    Load More